|Â || |
|"Anyone asking whether privatization is necessary is right to ask. As|
far as I am concerned, the answer is that Israel must decide whether
it is part of a "correct" economy and of the modern and global
communications market â€“ or not. Is it possible, over time, in an
intensely competitive communications market, to maintain Bezeq as a
government company? My answer is â€“ No!" Biran was speaking at
the Israel Management Center Congress, in a special panel which
discussed the question of Bezeq's privatization.
Biran went on to say: "The management of Bezeq is living in a rented
apartment. The landlords are the State and the public. Bezeq's job is
to show the apartment to potential buyers, but it is not the seller.
The State can decide it doesn't want to sell Bezeq â€“ it is fully
entitled to make such a decision. If it doesnâ€™t want to sell, it
can find a thousand reasons why not, but I believe that would be a
Biran reviewed the privatization process, which has been going on for
several years now, and gave some of the main reasons why he believes
it is essential to continue that process. Over-supervision of Bezeq
prevents it from functioning in competitive conditions, he said.
"Bezeq cannot function when the State controls its employees'
salaries, the Finance Committee controls the telephone tariffs, and
because of the Tenders Law the company finds itself in court every
other day. The question is whether the State sees Bezeq as something
it owns or as overlord and regulator. Trying to be both is a conflict
of interests by definition."
"So why don't they privatize? We know the government intends to
privatize Bezeq. All our prime ministers have said so, but the
question is can the State do it? The privatization process started 12
years ago â€“ but it's all sound and fury, signifying nothing,"
Brian summed up.
Biran also tried to shed light on the newspaper reports about the
Bezeq-Shamrock transaction for the acquisition of Pelephone, and
complained bitterly about the incorrect reports. "It is the State of
Israel which decided that Shamrock, after buying Pelephone's shares,
could not bid for Bezeq. And whoever forbade it, can allow it. It's
the decision of the seller of Bezeq â€“ the State. And if and when
the State concludes that Bezeq should look into the matter of changing
the option it was given to buy Shamrock's shares in Pelephone, then
Bezeq will look into it," said Biran.